SIMONS ET AL., EXECUTORS,

v.

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Triplett v. Lowell, 297 U.S. 638 (U.S. 1936)
  …Dunmore, for a radio receiving apparatus. Each claim was held invalid by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Radio Corporation v. Du [*640] bilier Condenser Corp., 59 F. (2d) 305, 309, and petitions to this Court for certiorari were denied, 287 U. S. 648, 650. More than eight months after the denial, of certiorari respondents filed, in the Patent Office, purported disclaimers of each of the claims thus held invalid, and more than a month later began the present suit in the district court for Marylan…
• United States v. Tillinghast, 69 F.2d 718 (1st Cir. 1934)
  …States v. Updike (D. C.) 1 F.(2d) 550, which was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in 8 F. (2d) 913; and in the case of McDonnell v. United States, supra, certiorari was also denied by the United States Supreme Court in 287 U. S. 648, 53 S. Ct. 95, 77 L. Ed. 560. The Commissioner, after examining the taxpayer’s return and records, notified the taxpayer that an excess profits tax return was required, which it refused to file. It seems to me, therefore, that the statute of limit…
• Mercantile Nat'l Bank OF Chicago v. Howmet Corp., 524 F.2d 1031 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …); Yablick v. Protecto Safety Appliance Corp., 21 F. 2d 885, 889 (3d Cir. 1927); Dubilier Condenser Corp. v. Radio Corp. of America, 34 F. 2d 450, 463—464 (D.Del.1929), rev’d on other grounds, 59 F. 2d 305, 59 F. 2d 309 (3d Cir. 1932), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 648, 53 S.Ct. 96, 77 L.Ed. 560 (1932); Berghane v. Radio Corp. of America, 6 F.R.D. 561, 563 (D.Del.1947).2 We think the rule of these cases is not affected by the doctrine of Precision Instrument Mfg. Co. v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co., 324 U.…