GOETZ
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1932-10-24
No. 372
287 U.S. 649 Supreme Court of the United States (1932) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Moynagh, 566 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1977)
    …efendant retained only an equitable interest in the boats, failure to list that interest could support the charge. See United States v. Schireson, 116 F. 2d 881, 883 (3d Cir. 1940); Goetz v. United States, 59 F. 2d 511, 512 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 649, 53 S.Ct. 95, 77 L.Ed. 561 (1932). See also Duggins v. Heffron, 128 F. 2d 546, 548 (9th Cir. 1942). We conclude that there existed sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the defendant retained an equitable interest in the boats and that the…
  • In re N. Pigment Co., 71 F.2d 447 (C.C.P.A. 1934)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw