MULLENDORE ET AL.

v.

OSAGE TRIBE OF INDIANS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 105 F.2d 160 (2d Cir. 1939)
  …that the underwriters had not met the burden ■of showing that the fire or its spreading was the result of the design or neglect of the owner. The Salvore, 2 Cir., 60 F. 2d 683, certiorari denied United States Steel Products Co. v. Navigazione etc., 287 U.S. 653, 53 S.Ct. 117, 77 L.Ed. 565. He reached this conclusion because the location of the extension rods had been generally approved by competent engineers and surveyors, see The Older, 2 Cir., 65 F. 2d 359, and there had been no suggestion from which th…
• Du Pont de Nemours Int'l S.A. v. Mormacvega, 493 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …tial evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We are not breaking new ground in recognizing that technological innovation and vessel design may justify stowage other than below deck. See, e. g., The Salvore, 60 F. 2d 683, 685 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 653 (1932); Lagerloef [*103] Trading Co. v. United States, 43 F. 2d 871, 872 (S.D.N.Y.1930); The William Crane, 50 Fed. 444 (D.Md.1889); The Neptune, 17 Fed.Cas. 1343, 1344 (No. 10,118) (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1868). Cf. Encyclopaedia Brittanica Inc. v. Hong Kong…
• Blackler v. F. Jacobus Transp. Co., Inc., 243 F.2d 733 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …n of suits and the prosecution of claims elsewhere than in these proceedings. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. Gallotta, 2 Cir., 145 F. 2d 870; The Salvore, 2 Cir., 36 F. 2d 712, certiorari denied United States Steel Products Co. v. Navigazione, etc., 287 U.S. 653, 53 S.Ct. 117, 77 L.Ed. 565. Appellants, two damage claimants, seek reversal of the district court’s refusal to dismiss the tug owner’s petition because it does not in terms allege his lack of privity and knowledge as to the accident. But the rathe…