SCOTT LUMBER CO.

v.

SUBURBAN IMPROVEMENT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1939)
  …d be accepted and favorably acted upon if there were no participation by the other states in the litigation. See New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393; Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 A. 303, certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 660, 288 U. S. 617; In re Dorrance, 115 N. J. Eq. 268; 170 A. 601; Dorrance v. Martin, 116 N. J. Law 362; 184 A. 743, certiorari denied, 298 U. S. 678. Cf. Matter of Trowbridge, 266 N. Y. 283; 194 N. E. 756. In addition the facts most essential to estab…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hill v. Martin, 296 U.S. 393 (U.S. 1935)
  …e intangible property, as well as upon the real estate and tangible personal property situated [*397] there. Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 Atl. 303. No question under the Federal Constitution was presented. Certiorari was denied by this Court, 287 U. S. 660; 288 U. S. 617. In satisfaction of the judgment, the executors paid to Pennsylvania $14,394,698.88, and $104,-278.03 as interest thereon; and they also gave a bond in the sum of $4,000,000 to pay additional amounts, if upon final determination of th…
• Worcester Cnty. Tr. Co. v. Riley, 302 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1937)
  …edent was last domiciled there, cf. Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 Atl. 303; In re Estate of Dorrance, 115 N. J. Eq. 268; 170 Atl. 601; 116 N. J. Eq. 204; 172 Atl. 503, with New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Dorrance v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 660; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393, although he could not be domiciled in both; that neither state could constitutionally authorize its officials to impose the tax if decedent was last domiciled elsewhere, and petitioner is thus exposed to the danger of…