PURITAN PHARMACEUTICAL CO.

v.

ANSEHL

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …5 L.Ed.2d 266 (1960), this Court affirmed the proposition that “when the prosecution uses testimony of a defendant before the grand jury, the defendant must be allowed to inspect it.” See United States v. Cotter, 60 F. 2d 689 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 666, 53 S.Ct. 291, 77 L.Ed. 575 (1932). In Stone, where the court did not examine the transcript, this Court on appeal reversed the conviction on one count since it was not certain that the grand jury transcript which this Court had examined would not h…
• United States v. Krulewitch, 145 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1944)
  ….Ct. 454, 68 L.Ed. 867; United States v. Rosenfeld, 2 Cir., 57 F. 2d 74, certiorari denied Nachman v. United States, 286 U.S. 556, 52 S.Ct. 642, 76 L.Ed. 1290; United States v. Cotter, 2 Cir., 60 F. 2d 689, certiorari denied Cotter v. United States, 287 U.S. 666, 53 S.Ct. 291, 77 L.Ed. 575; Lennon v. United States, 8 Cir.. 20 F. 2d 490, 493; Little v. United States, 8 Cir., 93 F. 2d 401, 407, certiorari denied 303 U.S. 644, 58 S.Ct. 643, 82 L.Ed. 1105, rehearing denied 303 U.S. 668, 58 S.Ct. 756, 82 L.Ed. 1…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Tex. Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 1301 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …ible. All human perception includes elements of subjective conclusions, and the line between factual and opinion testimony is often undefinable. As stated by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. Cotter, 60 F. 2d 689, 693-694 (2 Cir), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 666, 53 S.Ct. 291, 77 L.Ed. 575 (1932): No rule is subject to greater abuse [than the opinion testimony rule]; it is frequently an obstacle to any intelligible account of what happens. Most witnesses will tell their story in colloquial speech which ski…