WILBUR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR,

v.

UNITED STATES EX REL. CHESTATEE PYRITES & CHEMICAL CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Concordia Fire Ins. Co. v. Illinois, 292 U.S. 535 (U.S. 1934)
  …00 U.S. 226; Quong Wing v. Kirkendall, 223 U.S. 59; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U.S. 89; Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, supra; State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, supra; N.Y. ex rel. N.Y. & Albany Lighterage Co. v. Lynch, 288 U.S. 590; Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Seattle, 291 U.S. 619; A. Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, ante, p. 40. By the very law of their being, companies whose principal business is to provide insurance against fire, but who provide casualty insurance in a very…
• Ickes v. United States Ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chem. Corp., 289 U.S. 510 (U.S. 1933)
  …riation made by Congress for the payment of such losses.” The District Court sustained the position of the Secretary. Its judgment was reversed by the Court of Appeals of the District, 61 App. D.C. 324; 62 F. (2d) 863. This Court granted certiorari, 288 U.S. 590. We think the District Court was right. First. The Corporation contends that in computing losses which “have,been suffered” as of March 2, 1919, no distinction can be drawn betweén the' principal of the loan and the interest thereon; that as the am…