CONKLIN

v.

LING ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Layden, 233 F.2d 148 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …. As the Master noted, the Kwik Set case was eked with apparent approval in Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Co., 324 U.S. 320, 329, 65 S.Ct. 647, 89 L.Ed. 973. . United Chromium v. International Silver Co., 2 Cir., 60 F. 2d 913, certiorari denied 288 U.S. 600, 53 S.Ct. 319, 77 L.Ed. 976. . Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Celanese Corp. of America, 6 Cir., 135 F. 2d 138, 145-146; David Belais, Inc., v. Goldsmith Bros. Smelting & Refining Co., 2 Cir., 10 F. 2d 673; Brady Brass Co. v. Ajax Metal Co., 3 Cir.…
• L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. COE, 104 F.2d 230 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …i denied, 300 U.S. 665, 57 S.Ct. 508, 81 L.Ed. 873. See also, Standard Oil Development Co. v. James B. Berry Sons Co., Inc., 3 Cir., 92 F. 2d 386, 387. United Chromium, Inc. v. International Silver Co., 2 Cir., 60 F. 2d 913, 917, certiorari denied, 288 U.S. 600, 53 S.Ct. 319, 77 L.Ed. 976. Electric Cable Joint Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co., Inc., 292 U.S. 69, 79, 54 S.Ct. 586, 78 L.Ed. 1131; Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp., 294 U.S. 477, 486, 55 S.Ct. 455, 79 L.Ed. 1005; Atlantic Wo…
• Columbia Broad. Sys. v. Sylvania Elec. Prods., Inc., 415 F.2d 719 (1st Cir. 1969)
  …not made his discovery, the art might well have eventually arrived at the same result. But arguably inevitable technological progress is not the test. United Chromium, Inc. v. International Silver Co., 60 F. 2d 913, 916 (2d Cir. 1932), cert. denied, 288 U.S. 600, 53 S.Ct. 319, 77 L.Ed. 976 (1933). It is well settled that in retrospect the most creative developments often appear commonplace. The critical question is whether at the time • of invention the subject would have been obvious to one skilled in the…