RIO BRAVO OIL CO. ET AL.
v.
WEED ET AL.
RIO BRAVO OIL CO. ET AL.
WEED ET AL.
288 U.S. 603
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Henley v. The United States, 396 F.2d 956 (Ct. Cl. 1968)…never possible, to the true intention of the parties. Fortner v. Johnson, 404 S.W. 2d 892,900 (Tex.Civ.App.1966), writ of error refused n. r. e.; Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Weed, 121 Tex. 427, 50 S.W. 2d 1080, 1087, 85 A.L.R. 391 (Tex.1932), cert. denied, 288 U.S. 603, 53 S.Ct. 387, 77 L.Ed. 978 (1933). It is clear that the intention of the parties was that both the surface and the minerals were to be sold by Hill to Henley at one time for the total sum of $50 per acre. There was to be no separation of the miner…