NEELY
v.
STACY ET AL.

U.S. | 1933-02-13
No. 622
288 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Green v. Obergfell, 121 F.2d 46 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
    …nce, the proper tribunal to solve the difficulties of the parties to this controversy.” Stillwell Theatre, Inc. v. Kaplan, 259 N.Y. 405, 412, 182 N.E. 63, 66, 84 A.L.R. 6, rehearing denied, 260 N.Y. 563, 184 N.E. 93, 84 A.L.R. 6, certiorari denied, 288 U.S. 606, 53 S.Ct. 397, 77 L.Ed. 981: “We would be departing from established precedents if we upheld this injunction. We would thereby give to one labor union an advantage over another by prohibiting the use of peaceful and honest persuasion in matters of e…
  • Neely v. Merchs. Tr. Co. of Red Bank, 113 F.2d 953 (3d Cir. 1940)
    …nt claimed that though the will had been in his possession, he had lost it. The Prerogative Court did not credit this statement. In re Calef’s Will, 109 N.J.Eq. 181, 156 A. 475, affirmed 111 N.J.Eq. 355, 162 A. 579, certiorari denied Neely v. Stacy, 288 U.S. 606, 53 S.Ct. 397, 77 L.Ed. 981. Following denial of certiorari, the suit at. bar was commenced. Was the learned District Judge in error in holding that the appellant had not sustained the heavy burden placed upon him under circumstances such as those…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw