CROCKER, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY,

v.

KAY, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By

• O'Connor v. Rhodes, 79 F.2d 146 (D.C. Cir. 1935)
  …escribed as private money, it is a federal fund to which the government occupies at least the relation of trustee. ‘ A somewhat similar question arose in Richmond, F. & P. R. Co. v. McCarl, 61 App. D. C. 290, 62 F.(2d) 203, 206, certiorari denied, 288 U. S. 615, 53 S. Ct. 506, 77 L. Ed. 988. In that case we had under consideration the question whether excess income under -section 15a of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended by the Act of February 28, 1920, 41 Stat. 488, § 422 (49 USCA § 15a), was public…
• Haskins Bros. & Co. v. Morgenthau, 85 F.2d 677 (D.C. Cir. 1936)
  …disposition. It is incorrect, therefore, to say that the authority and duty of the United States depend alone upon their pecuniary interest. This we held in Richmond, F. & P. R. Co. v. McCarl, 61 App.D.C. 290, 62 F.(2d) 203, 206, certiorari denied 288 U.S. 615, 53 S.Ct. 506, 77 L.Ed. 988. There we had under consideration an act of Congress providing that earnings of railroads in excess of a stated percentage should be paid over to the Interstate Commerce Commission in order to establish a fund which might…
• Furr v. Herzmark, 206 F.2d 468 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
  …46, 153; Carson v. Jackson, 1922, 52 App.D.C. 51, 281 F. 411; Cayton v. English, 1927, 57 App.D.C. 324, 23 F. 2d 745; Hazen v. Mullen, 1929, 59 App.D.C. 3, 32 F. 2d 394; Wilson v. Borden, 1932, 61 App.D.C. 327, 62 F. 2d 866, certiorari denied, 1933, 288 U.S. 615, 53 S.Ct. 506, 77 L.Ed. 988; Carr v. Shifflette, 1936, 65 App.D.C. 268, 82 F. 2d 874; Hohenthal v. Smith, 1940, 72 App.D.C. 343, 114 F. 2d 494; Rodgers v. Lawson, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 170 F. 2d 157; Teichmann v. Parrish, 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C.…