DORLAND
v.
WITMER ET AL.
DORLAND
WITMER ET AL.
288 U.S. 616
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Tahoma. Pierce v. United States, 87 F.2d 349 (9th Cir. 1936)…o be correct. 44 F.(2d) 302, 304. That rule was followed in U. S. v. Davidson (C.C.A. 1) 50 F.(2d) 517 (cert. den. 284 U.S. 660, 52 S.Ct. 36, 76 L.Ed. 559); Jackman v. U. S. (C.C.A.l) 56 F.(2d) 358; Gaul v. U. S. (C.C.A.l) 62 F. (2d) 559 (cert. den. 288 U.S. 616, 53 S.Ct. 507, 77 L.Ed. 989). Appellant argues that in The Chiquita, supra, the violation charged was engaging in an unlicensed trade, whereas in the instant case the violation charged is using a certificate of registry to which the vessel was not…