MUELLER
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1933-05-29
No. 941
289 U.S. 711 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a sub-

stantial federal question. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U.S. 86, 108-111; Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273, 277; Miller v. Strahl, 239 U.S. 426, 434; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U.S. 343, 348; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503; Bandini v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 580.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rosenberg v. Wisconsin, 290 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1933)
    …Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) [*601] Meuller v. Illinois, 289 U.S. 711; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 580; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Bandini v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503. (2) Durland v. United States, 161…
  • Dill v. Colorado, 292 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1934)
    …Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Rosenberg v. Wisconsin, 290 U.S. 600, 601; Mueller v. Illinois, 289 U.S. 711; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 590; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Bandini v. [*610] Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503. Insofar as the papers wher…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw