IN RE ESTATE OF STEPHANIA ZARKEY, DECEASED

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-02-26
No. 64-353
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HORTON, JJ.
172 So. 2d 465 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order of the county judge’s court in Dade County holding that a will signed only with the “X” mark of the testatrix was not executed as required by § 731.07(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and which denied probate of the will, is affirmed on authority of In re Estate of Williams, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 464.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Est. of Willie Williams v. Williams, 182 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1965)
    …NELL, Justice. The District Court of Appeal, Third District, has certified to us, as passing upon a question- of great public interest, its decisions in In re Williams Estate, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So. 2d 464, and In re Estate of Zarkey, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 465. In each of these cases the county judge refused to admit to probate a will signed by the testator with a mark, similar to an X, on the ground that the making of a mark was not sufficient signing of the will under the provisions of F.S. Section 731…
  • In re Est. of Stephania Zarkey, 183 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on February 26, 1965 (172 So. 2d 465) affirming an order of the County Judges’ Court in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed December 15,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw