JACK LEWIS, INC.
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE ET AL.

U.S. | 1933-10-09
No. 138
290 U.S. 585 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial .federal question. Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365, 388; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U.S. 526; Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U.S. 394; Reinman v. Little Rock, 237 U.S. 171, 176, 177.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Robinson v. Bula E. Croker, 117 Fla. 582 (Fla. 1934)
    …67 L. Ed. 620; United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Co., 239 U. S. 466, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 212, 60 L. Ed. 387; Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360, 39 Sup. Ct. Rep. 512, 63 L. Ed. 1030; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585; 54 Sup. Ct. Rep. 61, 78 L. Ed. 517. : The present appeal, however, is not from a final decree but is from an interlocutory order of’the Circuit Court granting a- motion by the defendant below to vacate a lis pendens notice under Section 4550 C. G.…
  • United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1950)
    …runt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249; Hargis v. Bradford, 283 U. S. 781; Mahan v. Hume, 287 U. S. 575; Railroad Commission of Texas v. Macmillan, 287 U. S. 576; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U. S. 704; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585; Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599; O’Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co., 292 U. S. 609; Hammond Clock Co. v. Schiff, 293 U. S. 529; Bracken v. S. E. C., 299 U. S. 504; Leader v. Apex Hosiery Co., 302 U. S. 656; Woodring v. Clarksburg-Colu…
  • Acheson v. Droesse, 197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
    …v. Hume, 287 U.S. 575 [53 S.Ct. 223, 77 L.Ed. 505]; Railroad Commission of Texas v. Macmillan, 287 U.S. 576 [53 S.Ct. 223, 77 L.Ed. 505]; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U.S. 704 [53 S.Ct. 658, 77 L.Ed. 1461]; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U.S. 585 [54 S.Ct. 61, 78 L.Ed. 517]; Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Smith, 290 U.S. 599 [54 S.Ct. 209, 78 L.Ed. 526]; O’Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co., 292 U.S. 609 [54 S.Ct. 779, 78 L.Ed. 1469]; Hammond Clock Co. v. Schiff, 293 U.S. 529 [55 S.Ct. 146, 79 L.Ed.…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw