PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF INDIANA ET AL.
v.
NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF INDIANA ET AL.
NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.
290 U.S. 592
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The order granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed. (1) Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 159; Ex parte LaPrade, 289 U.S. 444, 455, 456; (2) Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229; Binford v. McLeaish, 284 U.S. 598.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Talking Pictures Corp. v. W. Elec. Co., 304 U.S. 175 (U.S. 1938)…States v. Johnston, 268 U. S. 220, 227. Moreover, the decision on that point rests on concurrent findings. They are not to be disturbed unless plainly without support. United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U. S. 1, 14. United States v. McGowan, 290 U. S. 592. Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U. S. 464. There is;evidence to support them. Nor would the writ bé granted to review the questions of anticijpation and invention that petitioner argues, for as to [*179] them there is no conflict between decisions…
-
Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co., 91 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1937)…n conflicting evidence are presumptively correct and will not be set aside unless a serious mistake of fact or law appears. National Reserve Ins. Co. v. Scudder (C.C.A.9) 71 F.(2d) 884; United States v. McGowan (C.C.A.9) 62 F.(2d) 955, 957, affirmed 290 U.S. 592, 54 S.Ct. 95, 78 L.Ed. 522; Clements v. Coppin (C.C.A.9) 61 F. (2d) 552, 558; Exchange National Bank v. Meikle (C.C.A.9) 61 F.(2d) 176, 179; Jones v. Jones (C.C.A.9) 35 F.(2d) 943, 945; Easton v. Brant (C.C.A.9) 19 F.(2d) 857, 859; Gila Water Co. v.…
-
Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., 99 F.2d 574 (9th Cir. 1938)…arly erroneous”. Furrer v. Ferris, 145 U.S. 132, 134, 12 S.Ct. 821, 36 L.Ed. 649; National Reserve Ins. Co. v. Scudder, 9 Cir., 71 F. 2d 884; Collins v. Finley, 9 Cir., 65 F. 2d 625, 626; United States v. McGowan, 9 Cir., 62 F. 2d 955, 957, affirmed 290 U.S. 592, 54 S.Ct. 95, 78 L.Ed. 522; Clements v. Coppin, 9 Cir., 61 F. 2d 552, 558; Exchange National Bank v. Meikle, 9 Cir., 61 F. 2d 176, 179; Jones v. Jones, 9 Cir., 35 F. 2d 943, 945; Easton v. Brant, 9 Cir., 19 F. 2d 857, 859; Gila Water Co. v. Internat…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1908)
- Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1929)
- Ex parte la Prade, 289 U.S. 444 (U.S. 1933)
- Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co., 284 U.S. 598 (U.S. 1932)