EX PARTE THOMAS ET AL.
EX PARTE THOMAS ET AL.
290 U.S. 597
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State ex rel. Fred Bleich & Dorile Bleich v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction for Hillsborough Cnty., 139 Fla. 43 (Fla. 1939)…on of the United State's, the Supreme Court has definitely settled that question contrary to the contention of plaintiff in' error. Leoles v. Landers, 302 U. S. 656, 58 Sup. Ct. Rep. 364, 82 L. Ed. 507 (192 S. E. 218, 184 Ga. 580); Coale v. Pearson, 290 U. S. 597, 54 Sup. Ct. 131, 78 L. Ed. 525; Hamilton v. Regents of University of California, 293 U. S. 245, 55 Sup. Ct. 197, 79 L. Ed. 343; Herring v. State Board of Education of New Jersey, 303 U. S. 624, 58 Sup. Ct. 752, 82 L. Ed. 1087. The Fourth, Fifth an…
-
Hamilton v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 293 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1934)…ow before us, decided against the contention of a student in the University of Maryland who on conscientious grounds objected to military training there required. His appeal to this Court was dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. 290 U. S. 597. [*265] Plainly there is no ground for the contention that the regents’ order, requiring able-bodied male students under the age of twenty-four as a condition of their enrollment to take the prescribed instruction in military science and tactics, tr…
-
Leoles v. Landers, 302 U.S. 656 (U.S. 1937)…Appeal from the Supreme Court of Georgia. Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Coale v. Pearson, 290 U. S. 597; Hamilton v. Regents, 293 U. S. 245, 261, 262.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence