UNITED STATES
v.
PROVIDENT TRUST CO., ADMINISTRATOR

U.S. | 1933-10-09
No. 224
290 U.S. 614 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gasoline Prods. Co., Inc. v. COE, 87 F.2d 550 (D.C. Cir. 1936)
    …s materials by another.” This exception to the general rule of Hotchkiss v. Greenwood has been given effect in many well known cases. See for example: United Shoe Machinery Corporation v. E. H. Ferree Co. (C.C.A.) 64 F.(2d) 101, certiorari granted, 290 U.S. 614, 54 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed. 537, dismissed per stipulation of counsel, 290 U.S. 708, 54 S.Ct. 129, 78 L.Ed. 608 (substitution, of aluminum for cast iron in the hammer arm of a clicking machine used in cutting shoe uppers); Re Harbeck, 39 App.D.C. 555 (su…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw