UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS
v.
BRYANT
UNITED ORDER OF GOOD SAMARITANS
BRYANT
290 U.S. 641
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Jewett et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 455 U.S. 305 (U.S. 1982)…ad attempted to codify.15 In both of these cases the [*314] transferee had renounced a fee interest before the administration of the decedent’s estate had been completed. In the earlier case, Brown v. Routzahn, 63 F. 2d 914 (CA6 1933), cert. denied, 290 U. S. 641, a husband refused to accept a bequest under his wife’s will. Under Ohio law the disclaimer was effective because it preceded the distribution of his wife’s estate. Since the husband had never acquired ownership of the property, his disclaimer was h…1 / 2
-
The Cleveland Tr. Co. & A. Dean Perry v. United States, 421 F.2d 475 (6th Cir. 1970)
-
Roberts v. United States, 316 F.2d 489 (3d Cir. 1963)…oral ingestion cases are the only known cases of harm, it is possible that no person was ever exposed to ethylene glycol in the same manner as plaintiff. Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co., 6 Cir., 1933, 64 F. 2d 193, 196, certiorari denied 1933, 290 U.S. 641, 54 S.Ct. 60, 78 L.Ed. 557. Plaintiff’s and defendant’s experts differed mainly in the quantity, the type of exposure, and the effects from exposure. Their testimony and all the other evidence of causation were exclusively for the jury. Brett v. J.…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence