WABASH RY. CO.

v.

ST. LOUIS

Citator

Cited By

• E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co., 136 F.2d 512 (6th Cir. 1943)
  …ct of property except in connection with an existing business or trade. American Steel Foundries v. Robertson, 269 U.S. 372, 46 S.Ct. 160, 70 L.Ed. 317. See, also, Caigan v. Plibrico Jointless Firebrick Co., 1 Cir., 65 F. 2d 849, certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 668, 54 S.Ct. 88, 78 L.Ed. 577; Jacobs v. Iodent Chemical Co., 3 Cir., 41 F. 2d 637; Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Philadelphia & Suburban Mortgage Guarantee Co., 3 Cir., 49 F. 2d 114. It has no existence in gross, but is inseparable from good will and…
• Keyes v. Madsen, 179 F.2d 40 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
  …ict Court, the appellant cannot urge it here. The general rule is that such a question, if not raised in the trial court, will not be considered on appeal. Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 1933, 64 F. 2d 921, 929, certiorari denied 1933, 290 U.S. 668, 54 S.Ct. 88, 78 L.Ed. 577; Southwestern Oil Co. v. State of Texas, 1910, 217 U.S. 114, 30 S.Ct. 496, 54 L.Ed. 688; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 1909, 214 U.S. 191, 29 S.Ct. 546, 53 L.Ed. 963. Moreover, if the plea were available it could…