CRAWFORD

v.

HALE

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. United States, 93 F.2d 685 (9th Cir. 1937)
  …States (C.C.A.1) 161 F. 694, 701, ‘we feel justified in trusting to the probability, or, at least, to the possibility, that, on a new trial, they may all disappear.’ ” See, also, Cady Lumber Co. v. Fain, 9 Cir., 65 F. 2d 644, 646, certiorari denied 290 U.S. 674, 54 S.Ct. 92, 78 L.Ed. 582; United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 9 Cir., 68 F. 2d 610, 612; Hunter v. United States, supra, 62 F. 2d 217, at page 220. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent wit…
• Woods v. Alwynn J. Cronvich, 396 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …the constitutionality of the Ohio indictment not only would usurp the power and responsibility of the courts of Ohio, but would frustrate the purpose of the extradition procedures as well. See Hale v. Crawford, 65 F. 2d 739 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 290 U.S. 674, 54 S.Ct. 92, 78 L.Ed. 581 (1933). Accordingly, the judgment of .the district court denying appellant’s petition for habeas corpus is Affirmed. . U.S.Const. Art. 4, § 2. . 18 U.S.C.A, § 3182.…
• Watson v. Montgomery, 431 F.2d 1083 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …the constitutionality of the Ohio indictment not only would usurp the power and responsibility of the courts of Ohio, but would frustrate the purpose of the extradition procedures as well. See Hale v. Crawford, 65 F. 2d 739 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 290 U.S. 674, 54 S.Ct. 92, 78 L.Ed. 581 (1933).” Also, Drew v. Thaw, 235 U.S. 432, 35 S.Ct. 137, 59 L.Ed. 302 (1914). In view of the foregoing authorities, it is held that petitioner’s first allegation is not cognizable by this court, and no relief can be gran…