RHODERICK, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.

v.

SWARTZELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Craig v. United States, 81 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1936)
  …C.C.A.10) 43 F.(2d) 353. The complete details of the plan, although they need not have been stated, could not possibly have prejudiced the substantial rights of the appellants. Hosier v. United States (C.C.A.5) 64 F.(2d) 657, 658, certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 677, 54 S.Ct. 100, 78 L.Ed. 584. Nor does the alleged fact that Mc-Keon entered the conspiracy after it was formed by the appellants affect the existence of the general scheme. “Such a conspiracy may be a continuing one; actors may drop out, and others…
• Colby v. Riggs NAT. Bank, 92 F.2d 183 (D.C. Cir. 1937)
  …Guy, 64 App.D.C. 314, 78 F.(2d) 198, certiorari denied, sub nomine Macrae v. Guy, 296 U.S. 585, 56 S.Ct. 96, 80 L.Ed. 414; Pollock v. Jameson, 63 App.D.C. 152, 70 F.(2d) 756; Rhoderick v. Swartzell, 62 App.D.C. 180, 65 F.(2d) 813, certiorari denied 290 U.S. 677, 54 S.Ct. 100, 78 L.Ed. 584; Matson v. Rusch, 61 App.D.C. 184, 59 F.(2d) 360; Garrity v. District of Columbia, 66 App.D.C. 256, 86 F.(2d) 207; Hazen v. Hawley, 66 App.D.C. 266, 86 F.(2d) 217. See, also, United States v. United Shoe Mach. Co., 247 U.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hosier v. Aderhold, 71 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1934)
  …te the National Prohibition Act, was duly committed to the Atlanta Penitentiary to serve a sentence of two years. At the time of his commitment the judgment against him had become final. Hosier et al. v. United States (C. C. A.) 64 F. (2d) 657; Id., 290 U. S. 677, 54 S. Ct. 100, 78 L. Ed.-. In February, 1934, he filed a petition for habeas corpus, on the ground that all lawful authority to keep him in prison or deprive him of his liberty came to an end immediately upon repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment. The…