MCMILLAN

v.

H. W. ROOS CO.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Teltronics Servs., Inc. v. Jules J. Hessen in Bankr. of Teltronics Servs., Inc., 762 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …nts and for society. See Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co., 244 U.S. 294, 299, 37 S.Ct. 506, 507, 61 L.Ed. 1148 (1917). It is a “principle of peace.” Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co. v. United States, 66 F. 2d 41, 44 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 290 U.S. 684, 54 S.Ct. 120, 78 L.Ed. 589 (1933) quoted in IB J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[1], at 186 n. 27 (1984). As stated by Justice Douglas: The general rule of res judicata applies to repetitious suits involving the same cause of action. It r…
• In re Seabury, 108 F.2d 232 (C.C.P.A. 1939)
  …s if filed at any time within two years from the date of the original patent in absence of a specific showing of the intervention of private rights. * * * ” He then cited and quoted from Roos Co. v. McMillan, 6 Cir., 64 F. 2d 568, certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 684, 54 S.Ct. 121, 78 L.Ed. 589. The Board of Appeals entered into no extended discussion of the question of laches, but agreed with the examiner in his conclusion that appellants’ said delay was fatal to the right of reissue. In answer to appellants’…
• Crowley v. Ickes, 107 F.2d 256 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …, 100, 53 S.Ct. 293, 77 L.Ed. 638. Crimora Manganese Corp. v. Wilbur, 60 App.D.C. 55, 58, 47 F. 2d 417, 420, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 861, 51 S.Ct. 654, 75 L.Ed. 1466; Aguilera v. Ickes, 62 App.D.C. 226, 227, 66 F. 2d 206, 207, certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 684, 54 S.Ct. 121, 78 L.Ed. 590. See Work v. United States ex rel. Rives, 267 U.S. 175, 181, 182, 45 S.Ct. 252, 69 L.Ed. 561; Tutun v. United States, 270 U.S. 568, 576, 577, 46 S.Ct. 425, 70 L.Ed. 738; Ex Parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438, 451, 452, 49…