ROSENBERG ET AL.

v.

LEWIS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By

• Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I. DU Pont de Nemours & Co. & Alamo Explosives Co., Inc., 750 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …er); Sure Plus Mfg. Co. v. Kobrin, 719 F. 2d 1114, 1117 (11th Cir.1983) (no presumption of non-infringement arises from the issuance of a patent to the infringer); Freeman v. Altvater, 66 F. 2d 506, 512, 18 USPQ 186, 192-93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 290 U.S. 696, 54 S.Ct. 132, 78 L.Ed. 598 (1933) (the court after finding equivalence stated that the issuance of a patent merely raises a presumption of validity, not a presumption of non-infringement). Du Pont contends that one skilled in the art in 1966 would…
• Viles v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 233 F.2d 376 (6th Cir. 1956)
  …ts giving rise to the taxes had occurred. Whatever tax liability existed by reason thereof was past due and in default. It had become an accrued liability. Rosenberg v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 66 F. 2d 271, 272-273, certiorari denied Rosenberg v. Lewis, 290 U.S. 696, 54 S.Ct. 132, 78 L.Ed. 599. Formal assessment by the Commissioner was not necessary to establish liability. Leighton v. United States, 289 U.S. 506, 53 S. Ct. 719, 77 L.Ed. 1350; United States v. Premier Oil Refining Co., 209 F. 2d 692, 697, affirm…
• United States v. Motsinger, 123 F.2d 585 (4th Cir. 1941)
  …uciaries is alternative and not exclusive. Phillips v. Com’r, 283 U.S. 589, 51 S.Ct. 608, 75 L.Ed. 1289; Leighton v. United States 289 U.S. 506, 53 S.Ct. 719, 77 L.Ed. 1350; Rosenberg v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 66 F. 2d 271, cert den Rosenberg v. Lewis, 290 U.S. 696, 54 S.Ct. 132, 78 L.Ed. 599. And it may be assumed that the limitation therein provided has application to such alternative remedy, and not to the old remedy under R. S. §§ 3466 and 3467. See opinion of Judge McDermott in United States v. Updike, 8…

  ← 1 / 2 →