CELOTEX CO. ET AL.

v.

MASONITE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Gasoline Prods. Co., Inc. v. COE, 87 F.2d 550 (D.C. Cir. 1936)
  …eenwood has been given effect in many well known cases. See for example: United Shoe Machinery Corporation v. E. H. Ferree Co. (C.C.A.) 64 F.(2d) 101, certiorari granted, 290 U.S. 614, 54 S.Ct. 69, 78 L.Ed. 537, dismissed per stipulation of counsel, 290 U.S. 708, 54 S.Ct. 129, 78 L.Ed. 608 (substitution, of aluminum for cast iron in the hammer arm of a clicking machine used in cutting shoe uppers); Re Harbeck, 39 App.D.C. 555 (substitution of fused cement for a soluble adhesive for holding together the laye…
• Kelley v. COE, 99 F.2d 435 (D.C. Cir. 1938)
  …ied by any recognized authority.” Patent Royalties Corp. v. Land O’Lakes Creameries, 2 Cir., 89 F. 2d 624, 627; In re Coykendall, 58 App.D.C. 280, 29 F. 2d 868. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Ferree Co., 2 Cir., 64 F. 2d 101, certiorari dismissed, 290 U.S. 708, 54 S.Ct. 129, 78 L.Ed. 608. In Potts & Co. v. Creager, 155 U.S. 597, 608, 15 S.Ct. 194, 199, 89 L.Ed. 275, the Court said: “The apparent simplicity of a new device often leads an inexperienced person to think that it would have occurred to any one…