ATKINS
v.
HERTZ DRIVURSELF STATIONS, INC.
ATKINS
HERTZ DRIVURSELF STATIONS, INC.
291 U.S. 641
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Cur [*642] iam:
Mr: John P. McGrath, with whom Mr. Joseph S. Robinson was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Henry J. Smith and J. M. Sheen were on the brief for appellee.
Judgment affirmed. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 293-301; Quong Wing v. Kirkendall, 223 U.S. 59, 62, 63; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 144; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117, 122-124; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U.S. 151, 158; Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U.S. 335, 338; Lawrence v. State Tax Comm’n, 286 U.S. 276, 283, 284; Continental Baking Co. v. Woodring, 286 U.S. 352, 373; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 396.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
O'Connell v. Pericles Kontojohn, 131 Fla. 783 (Fla. 1938)…n v. Collins, 114 Fla. 276, 154 So. 201; Whiddon v. Vickers, 127 Fla. 222, 172 So. 923; Armour & Co v. Virginia, 246 U. S. 1, 38 Sup. Ct. 267, 62 L. Ed. 547; Richmond Linen and Suppy Co. v. City of Lynchburg, 160 Va. 644, 169 S. E. 554, (Affirmed in 291 U. S. 641, 54 Sup. Ct. 437, 78 L. Ed. 1039) ; American Bakeries Co. v. City of Sumter, 173 S. C. 94, 174 S. E. 919 (Affirmed in [*788] 293 U. S. 523, 55 Sup. Ct. 120, 79 L. Ed. 635); American Bakeries Co. v. City of Huntsville, 232 Ala. 612, 168 So. 880, Vaug…
-
Cong. of Indus. Orgs. v. McADORY, 325 U.S. 472 (U.S. 1945)…9 U. S. 13, 15; Coffman v. Breeze Corps., 323 U. S. 316, 324, or in which there is no actual antagonistic assertion of rights. Cleveland v. Chamberlain, 1 Black 419; Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley R. Co., 243 U. S. 281, 289; Norton v. Vesta Coal Co., 291 U. S. 641; United States v. Johnson, 319 U. S. 302. Upon an examination of the record in this case we find that it shows that petitioners or some of them have members who are employed in the State of Alabama in industries whose employees are subject to the N…
-
Am. Bakeries Co. v. Sumter, 293 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1934)…Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Armour & Co. v. Virginia, 246 U. S. 1, 6; National Linen Service Corp. v. Lynchburg, 291 U. S. 641; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell, 233 U. S. 304, 315; Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U. S. 527, 537, et seq.…
Authorities Cited
- Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1924)
- Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1932)
- Magoun v. Ill. Tr. & Sav. Bank, 170 U.S. 283 (U.S. 1898)
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss., 286 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1932)
- Quong Wing v. Kirkendall, 223 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1912)
- Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1929)
- Hardware Dealers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U.S. 151 (U.S. 1931)
- Cont'l Baking Co. v. Woodring, 286 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1932)
- Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1932)