HARTER, RECEIVER,

v.

WALLACE TRUSTEE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Skelton v. United States, 88 F.2d 599 (10th Cir. 1936)
  …nited States v. Midwest Oil Co., 236 U.S. 459, 35 S.Ct. 309, 59 L.Ed. 673; Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 53 S.Ct. 350, 77 L.Ed. 796; Pleasant v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. (C.C.A.) 66 F.(2d) 842, certiorari denied 291 U.S. 659, 54 S.Ct. 376, 78 L.Ed. 1051; Commissioner v. McKinney (C.C.A.) 87 F.(2d) 811. We are not unmindful of the fact that section 17, title II, of the Economy Act, approved March 20, 1933 (48 Stat. 11; 38 U.S.C.A. § 717), expressly repealed all laws rel…
• In re Ga. Paneling Supply, Inc. v. Pennington, 581 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …retion to allow an appeal, we deny the petition. Action upon a motion for leave to appeal under Rule 6 is entrusted to the Court’s sound discretion. In re Hawkins Mortgage Co., 66 F. 2d 16 (7th Cir. 1933), cert. denied sub nom., Harter v. Wallace, 291 U.S. 659, 54 S.Ct. 376, 78 L.Ed. 1051 (1934). Where, for example, the question presented is not of sufficient importance, leave to appeal has been refused. New York Credit Men’s Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. David Strauss & Co., 296 F. 2d 702 (2d Cir. 1961).…