NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tyler v. United States, 397 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …e defendant for taxes on wagers ‘placed’ with him. Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427 [52 S.Ct. 417, 76 L.Ed. 861] ; Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492 [63 S.Ct. 364, 87 L.Ed. 418] ; United States v. McCormick [2 Cir.], 67 F. 2d 867, cert. den. 291 U.S. 662 [54 S.Ct. 438, 78 L.Ed. 1054]; United States v. Pepe [D.C.], 198 F.Supp. 226; United States v. Manos [3 Cir.], 340 F. 2d 534.” II. Requested Instruction The prosecution under Counts Five, Seven, and Eight was under 26 U.S.C. § 7203 as noted before…
• United States v. Campbell, 351 F.2d 336 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …f proving a Canadian tax paid or accrued on the proceeds of the stock sales. Since payment of the tax subsequent to the acts of evasion is no defense to prosecution therefor, United States v. McCormick, 67 F. 2d 867, 870 (2 Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 291 U.S. 662, 54 S.Ct. 438, 78 L.Ed. 1054 (1934), so much the less should be this belated attempt to advance a credit theory, (withheld even to the third day of the criminal trial) when no proof of payment, accrual or offer of payment was proffered. Only now is…
• United States v. Schwartz, 325 F.2d 355 (3d Cir. 1963)
  …shown that the attorney was familiar with all the necessary facts regarding the transaction or transactions. Under such circumstances the trial court did not abuse its discretion. United States v. McCormick, 67 F. 2d 867 (C.A.2, 1933), cert. denied, 291 U.S. 662, 54 S.Ct. 438, 78 L.Ed. 1054. The judgment of conviction and sentence on counts two and three will be reversed and the case will be remanded with directions to grant defendant a new trial. . The opinion of the District Court is reported at 213 F.S…