BENRUS WATCH CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1934-03-05
No. 752
291 U.S. 679 Supreme Court of the United States (1934) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …the Supreme Court of the United States in the early case of Taylor v. Benham, 5 How. 233, 12 L.Ed. 130. The Marcus case was affirmed, Revere Sugar Refinery v. Pennsylvania Trust Co., 3 Cir., 67 F. 2d 1008, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari in 291 U.S. 679, 54 S.Ct. 528, 78 L.Ed. 1067. In Re Portex Oil Co., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 859, and In re Breger Kosher Sausage Co., 129 F. 2d 62, decided by this court, are likewise cited on behalf of Darrow as appellant. In the Breger Kosher Sausage Company case, a b…
  • The United States v. Baldt Anchor, 459 F.2d 1403 (C.C.P.A. 1972)
    …in this case they were not imported together. It is well settled that articles which are not imported together are precluded from being classified as an entirety. See, e. g., Benrus Watch Co. v. United States, 21 CCPA 139, T.D. 46467, cert. denied, 291 U.S. 679, 54 :S.Ct. 529, 78 L.Ed. 1067 (1933); James G. Wiley, A/C Pasadena Firearms Co. v. United States, 56 Cust.Ct. 331, C.D. 2645 (1966). Appellees and the Customs Court have not taken issue with that long-established principle. Therefore, since the tran…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw