PEERLESS MOTOR CAR CORP.

v.

TAYLOR

Citator

Cited By

• Krivo Indus. Supply Co. & Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. Nat'l Distillers & Chem. Corp., 483 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …s most apparent in those cases in which the dominant corporation, to further its own corporate purposes, either organized or acquired the subservient corporation. For example, in Centmont Corp. v. Marsch, 68 F. 2d 460 (1st Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 291 U.S. 680, 54 S.Ct. 530, 78 L.Ed. 1068 (1934), a railway company organized another corporation to build an addition to the railway company’s line. Affirming the District Court’s conclusion that the corporation [*1106] was a mere instrumentality of the railway…
• Wright v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 112 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1940)
  …Since the purpose of the order is remedial, not penal, there is no basis for the contention that Wright’s violation of the statute must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. See Board of Trade v. Wallace, 7 Cir., 67 F. 2d 402, 407, certiorari denied 291 U.S. 680, 54 S. Ct. 529, 78 L.Ed. 1067. Nor can we accept the alternative argument that at least a fair preponderance of evidence is required. The statute declares in section 25, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78y, that the Commission’s findings of fact shall be conclusive…
• Nelson v. Secretary of Agriculture, 133 F.2d 453 (7th Cir. 1943)
  …punishment for a past offense but is a necessary power granted to the Secretary of Agriculture to assure a proper adherence to the provisions of the Act.” In Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Wallace, 7 Cir., 67 F. 2d 402, 407, certiorari denied 291 U.S. 680, 54 S.Ct. 529, 78 L.Ed. 1067, petitioner alleged that Section 6a, 7 U.S.C.A. § 8, was unconstitutional for the reasons here advanced. Section 6a provides that a commission composed of the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, and the…