ASSINIBOINE INDIAN TRIBE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (U.S. 1951)
  …not more than twenty-five dollars, or imprisonment for thirty days, or both.” This ordinance was previously challenged in People v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 255, 188 N. E. 745, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, Smith v. New York, 292 U. S. 606 (1934). Smith, who had not applied for a permit under the ordinance, argued that the regulation of religious speakers alone constituted an unreasonable classification. None of the questions involved in the instant appeal were presented in the previo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (U.S. 1951)
  …out a permit. The appeal to this Court was based solely on the argument that regulation of speakers on religion without regulating other speakers was an unreasonable classification. Responding to this issue, the Court summarily dismissed the appeal, 292 U. S. 606, citing three cases: Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144; Silver v. Silver, 280 U. S. 117, 123; and Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 396. All three concern the problem of reasonable classification and in no wise bear on the issue now befor…
• United States v. Goltra, 312 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1941)
  …k took no part in the consideration and decision of these appeals. Both parties also sought review by petition for certiorari because of this Court’s decision in Colgate v. United States, 280 U. S. 43, and Assiniboine Indian Tribe v. United States, 292 U. S. 606. The inclusion of the phrase “as of right” in the jurisdictional act sufficiently makes clear the intention of Congress to authorize either party to take a technical appeal to this Court. Cf. House Report No. 828, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess., p. 3. Act o…

Authorities Cited

• Colgate v. United States, 280 U.S. 43 (U.S. 1929)