MANHATTAN PROPERTIES, INC.

v.

IRVING TRUST CO., TRUSTEE; AND BROWN ET AL. V. SAME

Citator

Cited By

• SUN Ins. Off. Ltd. v. Clay, 265 F.2d 522 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …te did not have the right to deprive a defendant of a contractual provision limiting the time within which suit could be brought. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co., 292 U.S. 143, 54 S.Ct. 634, 78 L.Ed. 1178, rehearing denied 292 U.S. 607, 54 S.Ct. 772, 78 L.Ed. 1468. In the Delta & Pine Land case, the contract concerned a fidelity bond by which the defendant, a Connecticut corporation, qualified to do business in Mississippi and Tennessee, had insured the plaintiff, a Mississippi c…
• In re Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. Compton, 439 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …making of the contract is presumed to be the place of performance. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co., 169 Miss. 196, 150 So. 205 (1933), reversed on other grounds 292 U.S. 143, 54 S.Ct. 634, 78 L.Ed. 1178 (1934), reh. den. 292 U.S. 607, 54 S.Ct. 772, 78 L.Ed. 1468 (1934). The lien of the claimant could not have become “executed” merely by the signature of the buyer and the delivery of the form in the State of Mississippi. The subsequent addition of claimant’s signature as seller…