EX PARTE STECKLER ET AL.
EX PARTE STECKLER ET AL.
292 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Co., 125 U.S. 18, 38, 39; Cross Lake Club v. Louisiana, 224 U.S. 632, 639, 640; Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U.S. 272, 277, 278; Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Upper Sandusky, 251 U.S. 173, 178, 179; Girard Trust Co. v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 286 U.S. 523; Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 287 U.S. 577.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hastings, 296 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1935)…. 554, 565; Hammond v. Johnston, 142 U. S. 73, 78; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 370; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164, 166; Petrie v. Nampa Irrigation District, 248 [*194] U. S. 154, 157; Ex parte Stockier, 292 U. S. 610; Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio, post, p. 546. It was in the light of the considerations governing the exercise of the judicial power that the Criminal Appeals Act was enacted and appeals by the Government were subjected to the prescribed limitation…
-
Secor v. Fulton, 293 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1934)…nterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.…
Authorities Cited
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. La. Sugar Ref. Co., 125 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1888)
- Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. State of La., 224 U.S. 632 (U.S. 1912)
- Lang v. United States, 286 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1932)
- Long Sault Dev. Co. v. Call (as Successor of Kennedy), 242 U.S. 272 (U.S. 1916)
- Third Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. v. White, 287 U.S. 577 (U.S. 1932)
- Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Vill. of Upper Sandusky, 251 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1919)