COMER
v.
WASHINGTON

U.S. | 1934-05-21
No. 1025
292 U.S. 610 Supreme Court of the United States (1934) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273.

Mr. Ewing D. Colvin for appellant. Mr. John J. Sullivan for appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Hastings, 296 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1935)
    …. 554, 565; Hammond v. Johnston, 142 U. S. 73, 78; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 370; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164, 166; Petrie v. Nampa Irrigation District, 248 [*194] U. S. 154, 157; Ex parte Stockier, 292 U. S. 610; Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio, post, p. 546. It was in the light of the considerations governing the exercise of the judicial power that the Criminal Appeals Act was enacted and appeals by the Government were subjected to the prescribed limitation…
  • Secor v. Fulton, 293 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1934)
    …nterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw