MAY
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MAY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
292 U.S. 630
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R.R. Co. Sec. & Antitrust Litig., 543 F.2d 1058 (3d Cir. 1976)…413-15; § 5985 at 430-32 (1970 Rev.) (collecting authorities); 3B Moore’s Federal Practice, supra note 20 ¶23.1.17 at 152 nn.6, 8 (collecting authorities). . See, e. g., ArCola Sugar Mills Co. v. Burnham, 67 F. 2d 981, 982 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 292 U.S. 630, 54 S.Ct. 640, 78 L.Ed. 1484 (1930); Gorman-Wright Co. v. Wright, 134 F. 363, 364 (4th Cir. 1904), cert. denied, 207 U.S. 587, 28 S.Ct. 255, 52 L.Ed. 353 (1907). . At oral argument it was suggested that Irving would not have derivative standing und…