PERRY ET AL., TRUSTEES,

v.

PAGE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Barash, 365 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …ence of an offer of proof that would enable us to determine whether the evidence was relevant and more than cumulative. See Wigmore, Evidence § 20, at 357 n. 6; F.R.Civ.P. 43 (c); Price v. United States, 68 F. 2d 133, 134-135 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 292 U.S. 632, 54 S.Ct. 640, 78 L.Ed. 1486 (1934); Davis v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc., 191 F. 2d 901, 903-904 (8 Cir. 1951). But we are not disposed to be thus insistent when an attorney who, while pursuing an appropriate line of cross-examination in a crimin…
• Tinkoff v. United States, 86 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1936)
  …ormed appellant of the charges against him; there was no abuse of the District Court’s discretion in denying a bill of particulars. Paschen v. United States, 70 F.(2d) 491 (C.C.A.7); Price v. United States, 68 F.(2d) 133 (C.C.A.5), certiorari denied 292 U.S. 632, 54 S.Ct. 640, 78 L. Ed. 1486; United States v. Wexler (D. C.) 6 F.Supp. 258. Appellant moved for an election of counts upon which the government would prosecute. All other counts were dismissed. The two counts here inyolved are similar in that the…
• Rose v. United States, 128 F.2d 622 (10th Cir. 1942)
  …nell v. United States, 10 Cir., 65 F. 2d 324; Hood v. United States, 10 Cir., 76 F. 2d 275; Hood v. United States, 10 Cir., 78 F. 2d 150; Gates v. United States, 10 Cir., 122 F. 2d 571; Price v. United States, 5 Cir., 68 F. 2d 133, certiorari denied 292 U.S. 632, 54 S.Ct. 640, 78 L.Ed. 1486; Paschen v. United States, 7 Cir., 70 F. 2d 491. The bill should have been furnished in respect to the item “Other Income” in each count. But an appellate court will not reverse a judgment on account of.the improvident…