BEALE

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Story v. Rives, 97 F.2d 182 (D.C. Cir. 1938)
  …inal law may constitute an offense against the United States although the act committed was a crime only in the District of Columbia. That the decision is sound we have no doubt.5 Moreover, in Aderhold v. Lee, 5 Cir., 68 F. 2d 824, certiorari denied 292 U.S. 633, 54 S.Ct. 718, 78 L.Ed. 1486, and Bracey v. Hill, D.C.M.D.Pa., 11 F.Supp. 148, affirmed, 3 Cir., 77 F. 2d 970, the power of the Attorney General over the place of confinement of District of Columbia prisoners was sustained. The court said in the, la…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Beard v. Bennett, 114 F.2d 578 (D.C. Cir. 1940)
  …. note 4 supra. Cf. Zerbst v. Kidwell, 1938, 304 U.S. 359, 58 S.Ct 872, 82 L.Ed. 1399, 116 [*581] A.L.R. 808; Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1401; Aderhold v. Leo, 5 Cir., 1934, 68 F. 2d 824, certiorari denied, 1934, 292 U.S. 633, 54 S.Ct. 718, 78 L.Ed. 1480; Bracey v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 1937, 93 F. 2d 8. See also 5 Cir., 1938, 99 F. 2d 750. The substantial question would seem to be whether the Attorney General and the warden, as his representative for the exercise of custod…
• Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …ffer an alternative interpretation of section 24-209. They argue that Congress adopted the provision in order to reverse the decision of the Fifth Circuit in Lee v. Aderhold, 5 F.Supp. 950 (N.D.Ga.1933), rev’d, 68 F. 2d 824 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 292 U.S. 633, 54 S.Ct. 718, 78 L.Ed. 1486 (1934). The Fifth Circuit held in that case that District prisoners confined in federal prisons could be considered for parole under federal, not District, guidelines, and it rejected a prisoner’s argument that this disp…

  ← 1 / 2 →