BRUSSELBACK

v.

CHICAGO JOINT STOCK LAND BANK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bartle v. Asher S. Markson, 357 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …special counsel appointed to insure independence, cf. In re Martin Custom Made Tires Corp., 108 F. 2d 172 (2 Cir. 1939); In re National Pub.Serv. Corp., 68 F. 2d 859, 862-863 (2 Cir.), cert. denied Utilities Power & Light Corp. v. Irving Trust Co., 292 U.S. 641, 54 S.Ct. 773, 78 L.Ed. 1492 (1934); Weintraub & Levin, Practical Guide to Bankruptcy and Debtor Relief 201 (1964). The order dismissing the complaint is reversed. . The point had not been urged in the proceedings relating to the receiver’s suit.…
• Brusselback v. Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank, 85 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1936)
  …arm Loan Board was the proper administrator of the assets, the District Court dismissed the last-named bill, and on appeal to this court that decree was affirmed. Brusselback v. Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank et al., 69 F.(2d) 598, certiorari denied, 292 U.S. 641, 54 S.Ct. 774, 78 L.Ed. 1493. Answers to the first above-named amended bill were filed by various shareholders, including appellants, and motions to dismiss were overruled; and the cause was referred to a master, who heard the evidence, and filed h…
• Partridge v. ST. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of ST. Louis, 76 F.2d 237 (8th Cir. 1935)
  …the Farm,Loan,Board is charged with carrying out its provisions and to see ‘that the moneys are applied toward the satisfaction of the bonds.’” , ■ In Brusselback v. Chicago Joint Stock Land Bank (C. C: A. 7)-69 F.(2d) 598, 599, certiorari, denied 292 U. S. 641, 54 S. Ct. '774, 78 L. Ed. 1493, the same question was presented to ’ the Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit. It was contended, as here, [*239] that an administration of the securities in trust by an equity receiver was a matter of absolute rig…