STRIPLIN
v.
LAWRENCEBURG WAREHOUSE CO. ET AL.
STRIPLIN
LAWRENCEBURG WAREHOUSE CO. ET AL.
292 U.S. 645
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston v. Joyce, 97 F.2d 973 (3d Cir. 1938)…be affected by anything in the act, applies to tax liens, In re Brannon, 5 Cir., 62 F. 2d 959, certiorari denied, Ryan v. City of Dallas, 289 U.S. 742, 53 S.Ct. 692, 77 L.Ed. 1489; Dunn v. Interstate Bond Co., 5 Cir., 68 F. 2d 364, certiorari denied 292 U.S. 645, 54 S.Ct. 779, 78 L.Ed. 1496; Ingram v. Coos County, Or., 9 Cir., 71 F. 2d 889; In re Ivel Displays, Inc., 2 Cir., 74 F. 2d 702, and such liens are payable in bankruptcy out of the proceeds of the sale of the property subject to the liens ahead of c…
-
Union Nat'l Bank OF Chicago v. Weaver, 604 F.2d 543 (7th Cir. 1979)…U.S. or to modify existing contracts to the detriment of the Government without adequate legal consideration or a compensating benefit flowing to the Government.” See Bausch & Lomb Optical Company v. United States, 78 Ct.Cl. 584, 607, cert. denied, 292 U.S. 645, 54 S.Ct. 779, 78 L.Ed. 1496 (1934). The Comptroller reasoned — and we agree— that under this principle the SBA does indeed have the authority to waive the 5-day requirement as a condition precedent if the fee payment is made prior to default or the…