EX PARTE MORGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Bedell v. Lassiter, 143 Fla. 43 (Fla. 1940)
  …(2d) 708; State ex rel. Sherrill v. Milam, et al., 113 Fla. 491, 116 Fla. 492, 153 So. 100, 125, 136; State ex rel. Board of Comm’rs. v. Sholtz, 112 Fla. 756, 150 So. 878; Florida Ranch & Dairy Co. v. Everglades Drainage District, 74 Fed. (2d) 914; 293 U. S. 521. The judgment in the sum of $5,769.23 in behalf of Carter & Yonge dated August 23, 1937, was for professional services rendered the board in connection with the handling, in whole or in part, of the above named cases. The lien in favor of the attor…
• Rorick v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist., 307 U.S. 208 (U.S. 1939)
  …' file a petition for writ of mandamus to convene a court under § 266 made by the Board of Commissioners in a suit by a bondholder claiming impairment of the obligation of contracts existing under the 1913 Act. Ex parte Everglades Drainage District, 293 U. S. 521. The present suit differs from the earlier case in that here the trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund were made defendants. But what is decisive under § 266 is not the formal status of the officials sued but the sphere, of their functions regar…
• Wall v. McNee, 296 U.S. 547 (U.S. 1935)
  …66 of the Judicial Code (Spielman Motor Co. v. Dodge, 295 U. S. 89, 92; Ex parte Collins, 277 U. S. 565, 568; Ex parte Public National Bank, 278 U. S. 101, 104; School District No. 7 v. Hunnicut, 283 U. S. 810; Ex parte Everglades Drainage District, 293 U. S. 521; Everglades Drainage Dist. v. Florida Ranch & Dairy Corp., 74 F. (2d) 914, 915, 916; Rorick v. Everglades Drainage, 27 F. (2d) 377, 380, 381), the decree herein is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings to be t…