ABRAMS ET AL.

v.

VAN SCHAICK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (U.S. 1935)
  …other original packages in which it was brought into New York, but refusing an injunction as to milk taken out of the cans for bottling, and thereafter sold in bottles. See opinion on application for interlocutory injunction:—7 F. Supp. 776; and cf. 293 U. S. 522. The case is here on cross-appeals. 28 U. S. C. § 380. First. An injunction was properly granted restraining the enforcement of the Act in its application to sales in the original packages. New York has no power to project its legislation into Ve…
• Sw. Airlines Co. v. Tex. Int'l Airlines, Inc., 546 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …he same property rights do not establish privity here; Dallas and CAB lines executed the Letter Agreements before, not after the judgment in Southwest I. Radio Corp. v. Radio Eng. Lab., 1934, 293 U.S. 1, 54 S.Ct. 752, 79 L.Ed. 163, rehearing denied, 293 U.S. 522, 55 S.Ct. 66, 79 L.Ed. 634; see Kruger & Birch, Inc. v. Du Boyce, 3 Cir. 1957, 241 F. 2d 849, 854 (lessee held in privity with lessor as to issue litigated before the lease); IB Moore’s Federal Practice j]0.411[l] nn. 13-20 (1965); 46 Am. Jur.2d § 5…
• Corp. Comm'n of Okla. v. Cary, 296 U.S. 452 (U.S. 1935)
  …its discretion in issuing the injunction. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service Common, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 293 U. S. 522. Appellants’ counsel invoke the decision of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Oklahoma Cotton Ginners’ Assn. v. State, 174 Okla. 243, but it is unnecessary to analyze that decision or to attempt to determine its import in relation to subsequent litig…