MISSOURI PACIFIC R. CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1934-10-22
No. 19
293 U.S. 524 Supreme Court of the United States (1934)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in a dispute involving Missouri Pacific Railroad and other carriers against the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. The Court's brief affirmance relied on established precedent concerning the scope of ICC regulatory authority over railroads and interstate commerce.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The decree is affirmed. New York Central Securities Co. v. United States, 287 U. S. 12, 25-29; Texas v. United States, 292 U. S. 522, 531; Virginian Ry. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 663; Mississippi Valley Barge Co. v. United States, 292 U. S. 282, 286-287; Georgia Commission v. United States, 283 U. S. 765, 775; Assigned Car Cases, 274 U. S. 564, 580-581; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 254 U. S. 57, 62; Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States, 284 U. S. 575.

Mr. T. D. Gresham, with whom Messrs. Edw. J. White, H. H. Larimore, M. E. Clinton, and Herbert Fitzpatrick were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Carl McFarland, with whom Solicitor General Biggs, Assistant Attorney General Stephens, and Messrs. Daniel W. Knowlton and Charles H. Weston were on the brief, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Mr. Ben C. Dey, with whom Messrs. J. H. Tallichet and John P. Bullington were on the brief, for the Southern Pacific Co., appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw