PARAMOUNT PUBLIX CORP.

v.

AMERICAN TRI-ERGON CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Root Ref. Co. v. Universal Oil Prods. Co., 169 F.2d 514 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …York firm of Ward, Crosby and Neale. The decisions in both circuits, however, were reversed when the Supreme Court, first having denied certiorari and later granting it, held that the patents were invalid, 293 U.S. 587, 55 S.Ct. 101, 79 L.Ed. 682 ; 293 U.S. 528, 55 S.Ct. 139, 79 L.Ed. 638 ; 294 U.S. 464, 55 S.Ct. 449, 79 L.Ed. 997; 294 U.S. 477, 55 S.Ct. 455, 79 L.Ed. 1005. After this defeat, Fox was unable to pay his debts and moved to Atlantic City in [*532] August, 1935 to avoid his creditors. There he…
• The United States v. The Russell Mfg. Co., 349 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …he Tax Court or sue for refunds in the district courts. However, the Supreme Court has shown itself entirely able to deal with this kind of tactic, as witness the grant of certiorari on rehearing in Paramount Publix Corp. v. American TriErgon Corp., 293 U.S. 528, 55 S.Ct. 139, 79 L.Ed. 638 (1934). See Robertson & Kirkham, Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States § 354, at 704 & n. 16 (2d ed. Wolfson & Kurland 1951). . “However, with respect to the instant taxpayer the doctrine of collateral e…
• H. M. Kolbe Co., Inc. v. Armgus Textile Co., Inc., 279 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …ion in the Second Circuit, a concentration not likely to be diminished by our rulings in Peter Pan and here, this Court’s decisions make law for the textile industry in an unusual degree. Cf. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp., 1934, 293 U.S. 528, 55 S.Ct. 139, 79 L.Ed. 638. . It may be worth noting that the notice provision applicable in the DeJonge case, Rev.Stat. § 4962, as amended by the Act of June 18, 1874, c. SOI, 18 Stat. 78, was less explict in its command as to "each copy” than 17…