HUNT
v.
WESTERN CASUALTY CO.
HUNT
WESTERN CASUALTY CO.
293 U.S. 530
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
While, under the applicable law of Texas, the District Court was without authority in this suit to enforce an award of the Industrial Accident Board to afford a trial de novo (Vestal v. Texas Emp. Ins. Assn., 285 S. W. 1041; Texas Emp. Ins. Assn. v. Neal, 11 S. W. (2d) 847; 14 S. W. (2d) 793), the question of the true construction of the award was necessarily presented, and the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in reviewing the judgment of the District Court may be regarded as resting upon the determination of that question. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. E. C. Street for petitioner. Mr. Charles J. Faulkner, Jr., with whom Mr. W. W. Ñaman was on the brief, submitted for respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)…287 U. S. 569; Sevier Commission Co. v. Wallowa Nat. Bank, 287 U. S. 575; Fort Smith Sub. R. Co. v. Kansas City So. R. Co., 288 U. S. 587; Boynton v. Hutchinson Gas Co., 292 U. S. 601; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52; Hunt v. Western Casualty Co., 293 U. S. 530; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 294 U. S. 696; State Automobile Ins. Assn. v. Glick, 294 U. S. 697; Moor v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Neill, 302 U. S. 645; Aetna Ins. Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 302 U. S. 652; Tax…