WETZEL
v.
FULTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF OHIO
WETZEL
FULTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF OHIO
293 U.S. 531
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction: (1) Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, ante, p. 52; (2) Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U S. 326, 332.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carson v. The City OF Fort Lauderdale, 155 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…nt, the courts will give effect to the private rights secured by the Constitution and grant such relief as the circumstances justify. See also Martha Bright Farms, Inc. v. Broward Port Authority, 1934, 117 Fla. 361, 158 So. 70, 76, appeal dismissed, 293 U.S. 531, 55 S.Ct. 209, 79 L.Ed. 640; Martin v. Dade Muck Land Company, 1928, 95 Fla. 530, 116 So. 449, 464. Is the plaintiffs’ amended complaint so framed as to invoke the constitutional law enunciated in the foregoing decisions? As to this first aspect of…
-
Chandler v. Marlatt, 294 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1935)…nd the appeal is dismissed upon the ground that it does not appear that the decision of a federal question was necessary to the determination of the cause or was actually determined. Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Wetzel v. Fulton, 293 U. S. 531; Kagarise v. Railroad Commission, 293 U. S. 527.…
Authorities Cited
- Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U.S. 326 (U.S. 1933)