MITCHELL
v.
WASHINGTON

U.S. | 1935-01-07
No. 572
293 U.S. 533 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam: Mr. W. B. Mitchell, pro se. Mr. Charles W. Greenough for appellee.

The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied. The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Childers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 80 F.2d 27 (9th Cir. 1935)
    …procure the services of private individuals to aid them in their undertakings.” Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, supra, 269 U. S. 514, at page 526, 46 S. Ct. 172, 175, 70 L. Ed. 384. See, also, Tirrell v. Johnston, 86 N. H. 530, 171 A. 641, 654, affirmed 293 U. S. 533, 55 S. Ct. 238, 79 L. Ed. 641. The petition is denied, and the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed.…
  • Short v. Bd. of the Sch. Dist. of Upper Moreland Twp., 296 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1935)
    …Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 514; Tirrell v. Johnston, 293 U. S. 533; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 216, 225-226; Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal, 286 U, S. 123, 128.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw