DOUGLAS ET AL.
v.
CUNNINGHAM ET AL.
DOUGLAS ET AL.
CUNNINGHAM ET AL.
293 U.S. 551
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Ansaldo San Giorgio I v. Rheinstrom Bros. Co., 294 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1935)…carrier from the consequences of its negligence.18 The judgment is Affirmed. 1928 A. M. C. 109. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decree, 26 F. (2d) 1016, and this court denied certiorari, 278 U. S. 633. 3 F. Supp. 579. 73 F. (2d) 40. 293 U. S. 551. See Rule 38, 5 (b) of this court. St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. S. A. Companhia Geral, 263 U. S. 119, 125, and authorities cited. Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272; York Co. v. Central Railroad, 3 Wall. 107; Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co…
-
Douglas v. Cunningham, 294 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1935)…f any work enumerated in section 5 of this title [§ 5 includes periodicals and newspapers] except a painting, statue or sculpture, $1 for every infringing copy made or sold by or found in the possession of the infringer or his agents or employees.” 293 U. S. 551. See Rule 38, par. 5 (b) (c).…