ROYAL INSURANCE CO., LTD., ET AL.

v.

EASTHAM

Citator

Cited By

• Beausoliel v. United States, 107 F.2d 292 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …that a witness .was not sworn was not discovered until after the trial. Barnes v. State, 61 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 45, 133 S.W. 887, 891. 3 Wigmore, Evidence (2d ed. 1923) § 1747. See Chesapeake & O. R. Co. v. Mears, 4 Cir., 64 F. 2d 291, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 557, 55 S.Ct. 69, 79 L.Ed. 659; State v. McLaughlin, 138 La. 958, 70 So. 925; Overland Const. Co. v. Sydnor, 6 Cir., 70 F. 2d 338; Washington and Georgetown R. R. v. McLane, 11 App.D.C. 220; Solice v. State, 21 [*295] Ariz. 592, 193 P. 19; People v. Del…
• Campbell v. Am. Foreign S. S. Corp., 116 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …53 S.Ct. 252, 77 L.Ed. 439; American Lumbermen’s Mut. Casualty Co. of Illinois v. Timms & Howard, Inc., 2 Cir., 108 F. 2d 497, 504; McIntyre v. Texas Co., 2 Cir., 48 F. 2d 211; Royal Ins. Co. v. Eastham, 5 Cir., 71 F. 2d 385, 389, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 557, 55 S.Ct. 110, 79 L.Ed. 658. Viewed as a motion under Rule 59, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for a new trial for newly discovered evidence, there was no abuse of discretion in denying it. The facts alleged in support of the motion do not co…
• Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Combs, 76 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1935)
  …that “I slipped and fell” or “I had a fall” is attacked on the ground that it is hearsay evidence and supported on the basis that it is part of the res gestse. In Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Mears (C. C. A. 4) 64 F.(2d) 291, 292, certiorari denied 293 U. S. 557, 55 S. Ct. 69, 79 L. Ed. —, October 8, 1934, the court approved Professor Wigmore’s requisites for the admission of such testimony under an exception to the hearsay rule, Wigmore on Evidence (2d Ed.) §§ 1747 to 1750, saying: “To render them [such st…