NORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bufkin R. Fairchild v. POE, 259 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …e not identical with the Fairchild Patent, and that “* * * 4. .• • . , u a process is not anticipated by apparatus which may be used to carry out the process”. City of Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, 7 Cir., 1934, 69 F. 2d 577, 588, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 576, 55 S.Ct. 87, 79 L.Ed. 673. We agree with this principle, but it has no application to this case. What we have here is a state of art with prior successful process-as which have in fact carried out the £ j.- i u. v • nj n i i function of the Fairchi…
• United States v. Lutz, 295 F.2d 736 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …Co. v. Whiteside, 5 Cir., 1938, 94 F. 2d 409, certiorari denied, 304 U.S. 567, 58 S.Ct. 949, 82 L.Ed. 1533; Chase v. Hammond Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 1935, 79 F. 2d 716; Lowery v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 1934, 70 F. 2d 324, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 576, 55 S.Ct. 88, 79 L.Ed. 674. . In American Surety Co. of New York v. Normandy State Bank, 8 Cir., 1940, 108 F. 2d 819, 822, the court observed, “It has been held that one having the care, custody or possession of property for another, though without…
• REX Chainbelt Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 477 F.2d 481 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …ed as the property of the party who discovered the original improved principle, and may be embodied in his patent as a part of his invention.” Id. at 602. See also Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, Inc., 7 Cir., 69 F. 2d 577, 587 (1934), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 576, 55 S.Ct. 87, 79 L.Ed. 673. The theory seems to be that in the same way that an employee’s work is creditable to his inventor-employer under the conditions set out above, a fellow-employee’s work is creditable to his inventor-fellow-employee, at If…