EARL WITHROW, D/B/A EARL'S MARKET, AND ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., PETITIONERS,

v.

ALBERT E. PERRON AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Brevard Cnty. v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)
  …est is consistent with the comprehensive plan. It could be argued that the only recourse is to pursue the traditional remedy of attempting to prove that the denial of the application was arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. Burritt v. Harris, 172 So. 2d 820 (Fla.1965); City of Naples v. Central Plaza of Naples, Inc., 303 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA1974). Yet, the fact that a proposed use is consistent with the plan means that the planners contemplated that that use would be acceptable at some point in the…
• City OF ST. Petersburg v. Aikin, 217 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1968)
  …redetermination of proper classification. Quattrocchi v. MacVicar, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 873, 874; City of Punta Gorda v. Morningstar, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 449, 454. . Ibid. pp. 270 and 272. . Fla.App.3rd 1967, 200 So. 2d 624, 626. . Fla.1965, 172 So. 2d 820. . Lawley v. Town of Golfview, Fla.App. 2nd 1965, 174 So. 2d 767, 770. . Smith v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So. 2d 281, 284: “ ‘We will determine the reasonableness of the regulations as applied to the factual situation meanwhile ke…
• Davis v. Sails, 318 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …* * * * * “We therefore hold that the Zoning Ordinance, supra, is valid, but in its application to the building of the petitioner the same is on this record unreasonable and unenforceable.” (192 So. at page 876) Burritt v. Harris, Sup.Ct.Fla.1965, 172 So. 2d 820, is a landmark case in Florida. There the Supreme Court had occasion to pass upon the validity of a zoning ordinance of Duval County as applied to a particular parcel of property. In that case, the Circuit Judge dismissed with prejudice a complaint…

  ← 1 / 5 →