KULESZA ET AL.

v.

BLAIR ET AL., RECEIVERS

Citator

Cited By

• Confederation Life Ass'n v. Arminan, 207 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
  …, 1957); United States v. Garland, 122 F. 2d 118, 136 A.L.R. 918 (4 Cir., 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 685, 62 S.Ct. 189, 86 L.Ed. 548 (1941); Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Merchants’ and Mechanics’ Bank, 71 F. 2d 777 (5 Cir., 1934), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 593, 55 S.Ct. 109, 79 L.Ed. 687 (1934); Pacific States Life Ins. Co. v. Bryce, 67 F. 2d 710, 91 A.L.R. 1446 (10 Cir., 1933); Lipman v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States, 58 F. 2d 15 (4 Cir., 1932); Varas v. Crown Life Insurance Company, 20…
• Monsanto Chem. Co. v. COE, 145 F.2d 18 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
  …was not thereby made obscure, for any system controlled by electric switches for accomplishing the §ame result, would clearly have been an infringement.” Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp., 9 Cir., 1934, 68 F. 2d 664, 669, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 593, 55 S.Ct. 108, 79 L.Ed. 687. (Italics added.) And again, on rehearing of the same cáse (9 Cir., 71 F. 2d 641, 642): “We cannot agree with petitioner’s argument that, in the master’s view, the indefiniteness of this claim was analogous to that of a…